La La Land Longrie
How out of touch with reality is Mayor Diana Longrie? Her public statements repeatedly describe a world not in synch with what the rest of us see.
Exhibit A: "Longrie...said she was among those surprised when the Kelly and Fawcett law firm severed its ties with Maplewood. 'I don't know about the strained relationships,' she said."
Comment: Does Mayor Longrie suffer from some kind of receptive aphasia?
Exhibit B: "Le said ... that [former city attorney] Kelly said he was told by Mayor Diana Longrie [the Copeland background check] was to be an internal investigation . . . Longrie on Tuesday called that a 'bald-faced lie' because she would have recommended an outside investigation. She said she did not know who determined the background check would be internal."
Comment: Asked about this at Monday's meeting, Chief Thomalla identified the specific date on which Diana gave the order for the check to be internal. (It was a funny moment -- Diana asked Can you tell me exactly what day this meeting occurred? and Thomalla gave her the specific day. Diana then said, oh, she herself didn't remember exactly when she met with whom or what was said.)
Exhibit C: "Why would I want to offer up somebody's name who had a criminal record or things I didn't know about? I did the check; I have it in my computer. It's not any different than what they already have."
Comment: She also said she was very surprised to learn from the city's background check that Copeland was in business with her husband. It doesn't bode well for her background checking skills that she was not able to uncover that one. Or, she lied to the council (and the rest of us) when she feigned surprise about the relationship.
Exhibit D: "I don't think the [Schultz] report was talking about me. I always treat everyone with respect."
Comment: It's remarkable to assume that any time she is not named specifically, the report wasn't talking about her. (By that standard pretty much everyone can say the negatives in the report weren't about them, since it never actually says something like "Hjelle is a chump.") Even if you buy that, just run a search for mention of "Mayor" in the Schultz report, and find passages like these:
Comment: It says something about how in touch the mayor is if she missed the widespread rumors that a lot of people in city hall were updating their resumes and watching for new job prospects. Ultimately, employee concerns have led them to begin the process of forming a bargaining unit, to protect them from the capriciousness of the new controllers of the city. As the Pioneer Press quoted her, "This was kind of a surprise to me,'' was Longrie's response.
Exhibit F: "[Longrie] said Guilfoile gave Copeland permission by telephone to enter the clerk's office and retrieve the records."
Comment: Ask Guilfoile's attorney about this one.
This is just casual sampling of course -- there's a lot more out there, in the written record and even more if you watch the meetings (feel free to contribute them in the comments!). I don't really think that Diana suffers a neurological disorder. However, she just loves to play the ingenue.
Whether you accept her role as genuine (in which case she is naive, emotionally tone-deaf, unobservent, forgetful, and self-deluded) or a calculated, deceptive pose, it's not what we should expect from a city leader.
Exhibit A: "Longrie...said she was among those surprised when the Kelly and Fawcett law firm severed its ties with Maplewood. 'I don't know about the strained relationships,' she said."
Comment: Does Mayor Longrie suffer from some kind of receptive aphasia?
Exhibit B: "Le said ... that [former city attorney] Kelly said he was told by Mayor Diana Longrie [the Copeland background check] was to be an internal investigation . . . Longrie on Tuesday called that a 'bald-faced lie' because she would have recommended an outside investigation. She said she did not know who determined the background check would be internal."
Comment: Asked about this at Monday's meeting, Chief Thomalla identified the specific date on which Diana gave the order for the check to be internal. (It was a funny moment -- Diana asked Can you tell me exactly what day this meeting occurred? and Thomalla gave her the specific day. Diana then said, oh, she herself didn't remember exactly when she met with whom or what was said.)
Exhibit C: "Why would I want to offer up somebody's name who had a criminal record or things I didn't know about? I did the check; I have it in my computer. It's not any different than what they already have."
Comment: She also said she was very surprised to learn from the city's background check that Copeland was in business with her husband. It doesn't bode well for her background checking skills that she was not able to uncover that one. Or, she lied to the council (and the rest of us) when she feigned surprise about the relationship.
Exhibit D: "I don't think the [Schultz] report was talking about me. I always treat everyone with respect."
Comment: It's remarkable to assume that any time she is not named specifically, the report wasn't talking about her. (By that standard pretty much everyone can say the negatives in the report weren't about them, since it never actually says something like "Hjelle is a chump.") Even if you buy that, just run a search for mention of "Mayor" in the Schultz report, and find passages like these:
- "...the Mayor was repeatedly not recognizing those who were in the minority..."
- "...these questions were also directly sent to the Mayor to forward to Council and as far as can be ascertained, they were not forwarded on..."
- "The roots of the trust and communication problems are deep-seated and proof of the proposition that 'you reap what you sow.' Specifically, much of the conflict here stems from a cable access television show hosted by the Mayor's husband."
Comment: It says something about how in touch the mayor is if she missed the widespread rumors that a lot of people in city hall were updating their resumes and watching for new job prospects. Ultimately, employee concerns have led them to begin the process of forming a bargaining unit, to protect them from the capriciousness of the new controllers of the city. As the Pioneer Press quoted her, "This was kind of a surprise to me,'' was Longrie's response.
Exhibit F: "[Longrie] said Guilfoile gave Copeland permission by telephone to enter the clerk's office and retrieve the records."
Comment: Ask Guilfoile's attorney about this one.
~ ~ ~
This is just casual sampling of course -- there's a lot more out there, in the written record and even more if you watch the meetings (feel free to contribute them in the comments!). I don't really think that Diana suffers a neurological disorder. However, she just loves to play the ingenue.
Whether you accept her role as genuine (in which case she is naive, emotionally tone-deaf, unobservent, forgetful, and self-deluded) or a calculated, deceptive pose, it's not what we should expect from a city leader.
3 Comments:
At 1:26 PM, Frostbrand said…
It occurs to me that as shorthand we could just start using the "surprised!" emoticon...
:o
or maybe
=8-o
...as shorthand for "Mayor Diana Longrie." Sort of like Prince's old glyph.
At 12:06 PM, Anonymous said…
You asked: "How out of touch with reality is Mayor Diana Longrie? Her public statements repeatedly describe a world not in synch with what the rest of us see."
The public statements I see from her are mainly in her "From the Mayor's Desk" letters in the "Maplewood City News" publication that the city sends out every month. Reading through the June 2006 issue, I was fairly appalled at the deluge of meaningless clichés and political retoric she was spewing out. In case you missed it, it was all "make your tax dollar go further"-this and "prosperous future for Maplewood"-that. I actually went through it and underlined all the tripe, and came up with over 25 say-nothing, over-used, tired phrases crammed in that one letter.
Yet again, I have to wonder what Longrie's "vision for Maplewood" really is when she throws up a smoke screen of opaque phraseology like this. It's either that, or she really can't construct even one original thought.
At 7:53 PM, Anonymous said…
It might be interesting what a trained observer (in body language and lie detection) sees in the Mayor's performance at the last council meeting.
Post a Comment
<< Home